Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
Natural justice and pre-CIRP labour awards protect termination compensation, permitting withdrawal of court deposits despite later insolvency resoluti...
Arbitration of SEZ sub-lease monetary claims preserves rent, maintenance, termination, improvements and damages disputes while unused premises are vac...
Scientific research approval grants a research association tax recognition, subject to annual donor reporting, certification, and regulatory complianc...
Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share application money - The Tribunal noted that the assessee provided complete details of the share subscribers, their financial capacity, and the transactions were carried out through banking channels, shifting the burden of proof to the Assessing Officer (AO) who failed to conduct an adequate inquiry to disprove the assessee's claims. Therefore, the primary onus placed on the assessee by section 68 was discharged, and the addition made by the AO was not justified.
Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share application money - The Tribunal noted that the assessee provided complete details of the share subscribers, their financial capacity, and the transactions were carried out through banking channels, shifting the burden of proof to the Assessing Officer (AO) who failed to conduct an adequate inquiry to disprove the assessee's claims. Therefore, the primary onus placed on the assessee by section 68 was discharged, and the addition made by the AO was not justified.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.