Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Penalty levied u/s 271D - violation of the provisions of section 269SS - assessee sold an immovable property and received part consideration in cash - The Tribunal carefully reviewed the registered deed of sale, which clearly stated the receipt of cash as part of the consideration. The Tribunal found the assessee's contention regarding a wrong entry in the deed of sale unacceptable without material evidence. Therefore, the penalty under section 271D was upheld.
Penalty levied u/s 271D - violation of the provisions of section 269SS - assessee sold an immovable property and received part consideration in cash - The Tribunal carefully reviewed the registered deed of sale, which clearly stated the receipt of cash as part of the consideration. The Tribunal found the assessee's contention regarding a wrong entry in the deed of sale unacceptable without material evidence. Therefore, the penalty under section 271D was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.