Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Income deemed to accrue or arise in India - revenue earned by the assessee from the provisions of transmission services of voice, data and programmes of space segment capacity on Satellites to customers - AO held it in the nature of “Royalty” u/s 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act and Article 12(4) of the India-Netherland DTAA - The ITAT, while deleting the additions, held that, it is fallacious to assume that any change made to domestic law to rectify a situation of mistaken interpretation can spontaneously further their case in an international treaty. Therefore, mere amendment to Section 9(1)(vi) cannot result in a change.
Income deemed to accrue or arise in India - revenue earned by the assessee from the provisions of transmission services of voice, data and programmes of space segment capacity on Satellites to customers - AO held it in the nature of “Royalty” u/s 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act and Article 12(4) of the India-Netherland DTAA - The ITAT, while deleting the additions, held that, it is fallacious to assume that any change made to domestic law to rectify a situation of mistaken interpretation can spontaneously further their case in an international treaty. Therefore, mere amendment to Section 9(1)(vi) cannot result in a change.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.