Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision on various issues, dismissing the appeal of the Revenue. The implications include the affirmation of the deductibility of ESOP compensation, the restriction of disallowance under section 14A to investments yielding exempt income, the allowance of expenses related to the increase in authorized share capital, the recognition of legal and professional expenses as revenue expenditure, and the treatment of stale cheques as liabilities until settled or adjusted.
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision on various issues, dismissing the appeal of the Revenue. The implications include the affirmation of the deductibility of ESOP compensation, the restriction of disallowance under section 14A to investments yielding exempt income, the allowance of expenses related to the increase in authorized share capital, the recognition of legal and professional expenses as revenue expenditure, and the treatment of stale cheques as liabilities until settled or adjusted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
