Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Exemption from Service Tax - Advertisement Agency Service - Selling of Space - The Tribunal held that the appellant's activities did not constitute 'Advertising Agency' services but were correctly classified under 'selling of space for advertisement', which was not taxable during the specified period. Consequently, penalties under Section 78 on the firm and Section 78A on the partner were also set aside, granting relief to the appellant.
Exemption from Service Tax - Advertisement Agency Service - Selling of Space - The Tribunal held that the appellant's activities did not constitute 'Advertising Agency' services but were correctly classified under 'selling of space for advertisement', which was not taxable during the specified period. Consequently, penalties under Section 78 on the firm and Section 78A on the partner were also set aside, granting relief to the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.