Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Classification of imported goods - Encoder/Multiplexer under different Model - the Tribunal held that the goods are correctly classifiable under CTH 85 17 6290. - The revenue's appeal was dismissed, both because the Tribunal had already decided the classification and because the revenue proposed a new classification in their appeal that was beyond the scope of the original show cause notice.
Classification of imported goods - Encoder/Multiplexer under different Model - the Tribunal held that the goods are correctly classifiable under CTH 85 17 6290. - The revenue's appeal was dismissed, both because the Tribunal had already decided the classification and because the revenue proposed a new classification in their appeal that was beyond the scope of the original show cause notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.