Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate revie...
Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
Natural justice and pre-CIRP labour awards protect termination compensation, permitting withdrawal of court deposits despite later insolvency resoluti...
Arbitration of SEZ sub-lease monetary claims preserves rent, maintenance, termination, improvements and damages disputes while unused premises are vac...
Scientific research approval grants a research association tax recognition, subject to annual donor reporting, certification, and regulatory complianc...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessment u/s 153C - Relevant Date - date on which the AO of the person other than the one searched assumes the possession of the seized assets - The Tribunal's decision emphasized the principle that for initiating proceedings u/s 153C, it is essential to follow the statutory timelines and conditions prescribed under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal relied on judgments from the Hon'ble High Court and the Supreme Court to conclude that the assessments made for the Assessment Years 2006-07 and 2007-08, based on a satisfaction note recorded, were outside the scope of Section 153C. This led to the conclusion that these assessments were void ab initio, along with the assessment for A.Y. 2012-13. - AT
Assessment u/s 153C - Relevant Date - date on which the AO of the person other than the one searched assumes the possession of the seized assets - The Tribunal's decision emphasized the principle that for initiating proceedings u/s 153C, it is essential to follow the statutory timelines and conditions prescribed under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal relied on judgments from the Hon'ble High Court and the Supreme Court to conclude that the assessments made for the Assessment Years 2006-07 and 2007-08, based on a satisfaction note recorded, were outside the scope of Section 153C. This led to the conclusion that these assessments were void ab initio, along with the assessment for A.Y. 2012-13. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
