Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Transfer of pending application for winding up of the respondent company to the NCLT under IBC - The decision reflects the principle that winding up petitions pending before High Courts, which have not progressed to an advanced stage, should be transferred to the NCLT, in line with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and the Companies Act, 2013. The Supreme Court's judgment in Action Ispat and Power Limited v. Shyam Metalics and Energy Limited was cited, emphasizing that winding up proceedings at a pre-admission stage or those where no irreversible actions (like the sale of assets) have occurred are compulsorily transferable to the NCLT. - HC
Transfer of pending application for winding up of the respondent company to the NCLT under IBC - The decision reflects the principle that winding up petitions pending before High Courts, which have not progressed to an advanced stage, should be transferred to the NCLT, in line with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and the Companies Act, 2013. The Supreme Court's judgment in Action Ispat and Power Limited v. Shyam Metalics and Energy Limited was cited, emphasizing that winding up proceedings at a pre-admission stage or those where no irreversible actions (like the sale of assets) have occurred are compulsorily transferable to the NCLT. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
