Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Rectification of mistake u/s 154 against intimation u/s. 143(1) - Rejection on the ground that, revised return was not authenticated - The ITAT recognize the mistake in the original return was apparent from the record. The Tribunal, citing CBDT Circular, which urges tax officers to assist taxpayers in securing due reliefs, remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer for rectification. The Tribunal directed that the original return should be rectified, considering the revised return and relevant documents submitted by the appellant. - AT
Rectification of mistake u/s 154 against intimation u/s. 143(1) - Rejection on the ground that, revised return was not authenticated - The ITAT recognize the mistake in the original return was apparent from the record. The Tribunal, citing CBDT Circular, which urges tax officers to assist taxpayers in securing due reliefs, remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer for rectification. The Tribunal directed that the original return should be rectified, considering the revised return and relevant documents submitted by the appellant. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.