Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rectification of mistake u/s 154 against intimation u/s. 143(1) - Rejection on the ground that, revised return was not authenticated - The ITAT recognize the mistake in the original return was apparent from the record. The Tribunal, citing CBDT Circular, which urges tax officers to assist taxpayers in securing due reliefs, remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer for rectification. The Tribunal directed that the original return should be rectified, considering the revised return and relevant documents submitted by the appellant. - AT
Rectification of mistake u/s 154 against intimation u/s. 143(1) - Rejection on the ground that, revised return was not authenticated - The ITAT recognize the mistake in the original return was apparent from the record. The Tribunal, citing CBDT Circular, which urges tax officers to assist taxpayers in securing due reliefs, remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer for rectification. The Tribunal directed that the original return should be rectified, considering the revised return and relevant documents submitted by the appellant. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
