Pre-amendment reassessment limitation bars late notices under the preserved regime, invalidating consequential reassessment for affected earlier asses...
Cash-sales explanations for bank deposits require documentary reconciliation; reassessment notice survived where effective response time was available...
Functional comparability in transfer pricing prevents ad hoc arm's length adjustments where functions, assets, risks and reliable comparables are unes...
Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
Jurisdiction of CESTAT under GST Act, 2017 - Refund order passed u/s 142 - In the present case, the service tax was paid under the provisions of Chapter V of the Finance Act and refund was claimed u/s 142(3) of the CGST Act, under which the claim was required to be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of the existing law. - An appeal would lie to the CESTAT against an order passed u/s 142 - AT (Larger Bench)
Jurisdiction of CESTAT under GST Act, 2017 - Refund order passed u/s 142 - In the present case, the service tax was paid under the provisions of Chapter V of the Finance Act and refund was claimed u/s 142(3) of the CGST Act, under which the claim was required to be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of the existing law. - An appeal would lie to the CESTAT against an order passed u/s 142 - AT (Larger Bench)
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4921 
