Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Disallowance of Royalty paid u/s 37(1) - assessee is a franchisee bottler for the brand Aquafina owned by the franchisor PepsiCo India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. - there is no material available on record to show that the assessee has infringed the trademark registered in the name of PepsiCo Inc. - No basis in the submissions of the Revenue in denying the claim of deduction of Royalty paid by the assessee to Pepsi Foods Private Ltd during the year under consideration. - AT
Disallowance of Royalty paid u/s 37(1) - assessee is a franchisee bottler for the brand Aquafina owned by the franchisor PepsiCo India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. - there is no material available on record to show that the assessee has infringed the trademark registered in the name of PepsiCo Inc. - No basis in the submissions of the Revenue in denying the claim of deduction of Royalty paid by the assessee to Pepsi Foods Private Ltd during the year under consideration. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.