Embezzlement losses in charitable institutions remain allowable when misappropriation is established, irrecoverable, and not a specified-person benefi...
National long-distance undertaking status supports deduction where separately licensed infrastructure, resources, revenue, and expenditure establish c...
Agency reimbursement income follows contractual deposit-liability computation, while pending deposit collections do not constitute deemed-dividend loa...
Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
Validity of attachment orders u/s 281B - issuance of fresh attachment order again and again, i.e. for the fourth time - this Court is of the view that the respondent-Department under the guise of impugned attachment orders, shall not cause any unnecessary hardships to the Bankers in getting back their loans, which were lent by them to the petitioners. - Matter remanded back with directions - HC
Validity of attachment orders u/s 281B - issuance of fresh attachment order again and again, i.e. for the fourth time - this Court is of the view that the respondent-Department under the guise of impugned attachment orders, shall not cause any unnecessary hardships to the Bankers in getting back their loans, which were lent by them to the petitioners. - Matter remanded back with directions - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
