Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Validity of attachment orders u/s 281B - issuance of fresh attachment order again and again, i.e. for the fourth time - this Court is of the view that the respondent-Department under the guise of impugned attachment orders, shall not cause any unnecessary hardships to the Bankers in getting back their loans, which were lent by them to the petitioners. - Matter remanded back with directions - HC
Validity of attachment orders u/s 281B - issuance of fresh attachment order again and again, i.e. for the fourth time - this Court is of the view that the respondent-Department under the guise of impugned attachment orders, shall not cause any unnecessary hardships to the Bankers in getting back their loans, which were lent by them to the petitioners. - Matter remanded back with directions - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
