Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95633 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessee in Default u/s 201(1) and 201(1A) - period of limitation - non deduction of TDS - the term ‘reasonable period’ in the absence of any statutory limitation cannot be accepted as a straight jacket answer. - Since the CIT(A) and ITAT have accepted the period of limitation to be four (4) years, which in the teeth of the order of the Division Bench in the case of Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited (supra) cannot be said to be proper, legal or justified. - HC
Assessee in Default u/s 201(1) and 201(1A) - period of limitation - non deduction of TDS - the term ‘reasonable period’ in the absence of any statutory limitation cannot be accepted as a straight jacket answer. - Since the CIT(A) and ITAT have accepted the period of limitation to be four (4) years, which in the teeth of the order of the Division Bench in the case of Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited (supra) cannot be said to be proper, legal or justified. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
