Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Specific charge - There was obviously no clarity in the mind of the AO as to which limb of Section 271(1)(c) got attracted in the instant case for initiation, followed by imposition of penalty. ITAT was justified in law in deleting the penalty - HC
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Specific charge - There was obviously no clarity in the mind of the AO as to which limb of Section 271(1)(c) got attracted in the instant case for initiation, followed by imposition of penalty. ITAT was justified in law in deleting the penalty - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
