Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of penalty u/s 271D - violation of the provisions of section 269SS - cash loan received from director - transactions between appellant company and director are in the nature of current account transactions, which does not come under the purview of loan and deposit as per section 269SS of the Act. - No penalty - AT
Levy of penalty u/s 271D - violation of the provisions of section 269SS - cash loan received from director - transactions between appellant company and director are in the nature of current account transactions, which does not come under the purview of loan and deposit as per section 269SS of the Act. - No penalty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
