Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - AO in the course of assessment had made enquiries from the vendors u/s 133(6) and since none of them responded to the same doubted genuineness of the transactions - the AO/DDIT had erred in sending notices / conducting field enquiry at their erstwhile site office at Bangalore, which had since been shut down after completion of the hotel project. - Additions made by the AO is unsustainable - AT
Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - AO in the course of assessment had made enquiries from the vendors u/s 133(6) and since none of them responded to the same doubted genuineness of the transactions - the AO/DDIT had erred in sending notices / conducting field enquiry at their erstwhile site office at Bangalore, which had since been shut down after completion of the hotel project. - Additions made by the AO is unsustainable - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.