Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 95798 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
TP Adjustment - Benefit accruing on account of ESOP plans we find merit in the contention advanced on behalf of the Appellant that for the purpose of granting the RSUs to the employee of the Appellant was to retain and motivate him for continuing his employment with the Appellant. The cost incurred by AE on exercise of the RSUs by the employee of the Appellant is the cost reimbursed by the Appellant which was initially picked up by the AE. - ALP of the ESOP Expenses cannot be taken as ‘Nil’. - Additions deleted - AT
TP Adjustment - Benefit accruing on account of ESOP plans we find merit in the contention advanced on behalf of the Appellant that for the purpose of granting the RSUs to the employee of the Appellant was to retain and motivate him for continuing his employment with the Appellant. The cost incurred by AE on exercise of the RSUs by the employee of the Appellant is the cost reimbursed by the Appellant which was initially picked up by the AE. - ALP of the ESOP Expenses cannot be taken as ‘Nil’. - Additions deleted - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.