Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Penalty order u/s 129(1) of the UPGST Act - confiscation of goods - It was contended that, the goods, along with documents, were inside the railway station for getting the Railway Receipt as the number of the Railway Receipt is to be mentioned in the e-way bill - Once this fact was brought, from the date of interception till the passing of the impugned order, not a word has been whispered by either of the authorities below that there was any intention of the petitioner to evade payment of tax. - Cost of Rs. 1000 imposed on the Revenue / GST officers - HC
Penalty order u/s 129(1) of the UPGST Act - confiscation of goods - It was contended that, the goods, along with documents, were inside the railway station for getting the Railway Receipt as the number of the Railway Receipt is to be mentioned in the e-way bill - Once this fact was brought, from the date of interception till the passing of the impugned order, not a word has been whispered by either of the authorities below that there was any intention of the petitioner to evade payment of tax. - Cost of Rs. 1000 imposed on the Revenue / GST officers - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
