Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
Juridical seat versus arbitral venue determines supervisory court jurisdiction, while timely award challenges remain within the prescribed limitation ...
Charging Lease transfer fee - Amalgamation of company - The respondent no.1 acted de hors its own General Policy and meeting resolutions in claiming full transfer fees from the petitioners by treating the amalgamation between the petitioners no.1 and its companies as a “transfer” within the contemplation of the General Policy of the respondent no.1, although it falls within the exception clause thereof. - HC
Charging Lease transfer fee - Amalgamation of company - The respondent no.1 acted de hors its own General Policy and meeting resolutions in claiming full transfer fees from the petitioners by treating the amalgamation between the petitioners no.1 and its companies as a “transfer” within the contemplation of the General Policy of the respondent no.1, although it falls within the exception clause thereof. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.