Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Revision u/s 263 - The fact that the vouchers were not found in the premises of the appellant trust at the time of survey proceedings, should have triggered the AO to enquire and verify the evidence of the expenditure incurred on those items such as “Bonus, Perks and Allowances, Office Expenses, Tours and Travelling Expenses, Building Repairs Expenses etc”, which the AO had failed to do so. Therefore, this fact clearly demonstrates that the AO had failed to conduct necessary enquiries - Revision order sustained - AT
Revision u/s 263 - The fact that the vouchers were not found in the premises of the appellant trust at the time of survey proceedings, should have triggered the AO to enquire and verify the evidence of the expenditure incurred on those items such as “Bonus, Perks and Allowances, Office Expenses, Tours and Travelling Expenses, Building Repairs Expenses etc”, which the AO had failed to do so. Therefore, this fact clearly demonstrates that the AO had failed to conduct necessary enquiries - Revision order sustained - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
