Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Return of goods seized - Admittedly, the six months’ period has already lapsed - Indisputably, the Principal Commissioner of Customs has not extended the time period as postulated u/s 110(2) - The continued detention of the mobile phones by the respondents is illegal and untenable. - HC
Return of goods seized - Admittedly, the six months’ period has already lapsed - Indisputably, the Principal Commissioner of Customs has not extended the time period as postulated u/s 110(2) - The continued detention of the mobile phones by the respondents is illegal and untenable. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.