Permanent-establishment reassessment cannot revisit scrutinised disclosures; extended reopening fails without undisclosed material facts and within st...
Modified returns after business reorganisation must be assessed within pending proceedings, barring parallel scrutiny and consequential transfer prici...
Turnover mismatches under percentage-completion accounting cannot alone establish suppressed income where customer advances remain recorded as liabili...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reason to believe - Transaction of purchases being made by the petitioner from M/s NSE had been found to be bogus one on the basis of subsequent information, the mere disclosure of the same at the time of original assessment proceedings could not be considered to be disclosure of “true” and “full” facts and, therefore, in our opinion, the assessing officer certainly had jurisdiction to re-open the concluded assessment. - HC
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reason to believe - Transaction of purchases being made by the petitioner from M/s NSE had been found to be bogus one on the basis of subsequent information, the mere disclosure of the same at the time of original assessment proceedings could not be considered to be disclosure of “true” and “full” facts and, therefore, in our opinion, the assessing officer certainly had jurisdiction to re-open the concluded assessment. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.