Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - wrongful claim of lower LTCG - Disallowance u/s 94(7) - Dividend Striping - proof of bonafied mistake - ITAT deleted the penalty - Since the assessee had voluminous transactions, it committed an error while posting the relevant dividend entry, which was covered by one voucher since it was received on the same security. - Tribunal has observed that it was a reasonable human error - The assessee has proven that it was a bonafide mistake and no substantial question of law would arise - Appeal of the revenue dismissed - HC
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - wrongful claim of lower LTCG - Disallowance u/s 94(7) - Dividend Striping - proof of bonafied mistake - ITAT deleted the penalty - Since the assessee had voluminous transactions, it committed an error while posting the relevant dividend entry, which was covered by one voucher since it was received on the same security. - Tribunal has observed that it was a reasonable human error - The assessee has proven that it was a bonafide mistake and no substantial question of law would arise - Appeal of the revenue dismissed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.