Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Constitutional validity of Section 37A of FEMA Act - order of the Competent Authority affirming seizure by the Authorised Officer - seizure on the ground that the no agreement or legal basis was available for remitting the money by the petitioner. Royalty was not a part of the product cost - The challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 37A of the Act is rejected, as Section 37A does not suffer from any manifest arbitrariness on any ground whatsoever. - HC
Constitutional validity of Section 37A of FEMA Act - order of the Competent Authority affirming seizure by the Authorised Officer - seizure on the ground that the no agreement or legal basis was available for remitting the money by the petitioner. Royalty was not a part of the product cost - The challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 37A of the Act is rejected, as Section 37A does not suffer from any manifest arbitrariness on any ground whatsoever. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.