Permanent establishment tests: independent subsidiary premises and principal-to-principal dealings did not create Indian taxability for offshore suppl...
Valuation Officer estimates govern property-value additions once statutory valuation is invoked, requiring fresh consideration of objections and compa...
Waiver of written show-cause notice may prevent a later procedural challenge after participation in customs adjudication, preserving statutory appella...
Retrospective invalidity of ocean-freight IGST supports refunds despite non-party status and prior credit utilisation, subject to authorised appeal gr...
Additional evidence in departmental appeals may include show-cause-notice material without introducing a new case where it merely corroborates existin...
Reasoned rectification orders require consideration of expenditure disclosed in income-tax returns, preventing revision based on incomplete income com...
Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Condonation of delay in filing appeal - Or the appeal was filed within the time - Once the appellant had indicated in ST-IV form that the order was received by the appellant only on December 21, 2018, then it was for the Department to have controverted that the order had been received by the appellant earlier to this date and an explanation for the delay should not have been expected from the appellant. - since the appeal has been filed within the period of two months from the date of receipt of order by the appellant, the appeal cannot be dismissed by the commissioner (appeals) on the ground of delay iby calculating the period from the date of order - AT
Condonation of delay in filing appeal - Or the appeal was filed within the time - Once the appellant had indicated in ST-IV form that the order was received by the appellant only on December 21, 2018, then it was for the Department to have controverted that the order had been received by the appellant earlier to this date and an explanation for the delay should not have been expected from the appellant. - since the appeal has been filed within the period of two months from the date of receipt of order by the appellant, the appeal cannot be dismissed by the commissioner (appeals) on the ground of delay iby calculating the period from the date of order - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
