Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Validity of Revision u/s 263 - non mentioning computer generated DIN - Non-est order - Circular categorically mentions that subsequent to 01/10/2019, the computer generated DIN not only be allotted but be duly quoted in the body of the communication itself. - Neither the reasons nor the statement in the prescribed format is to be found in the order passed u/s 263 of the Act, spelling out the particular category of exception that prevented allotting the DIN on that day. It is yet another violation. - such an order shall be treated to have never been issued and, therefore, shall not take any affect. - AT
Validity of Revision u/s 263 - non mentioning computer generated DIN - Non-est order - Circular categorically mentions that subsequent to 01/10/2019, the computer generated DIN not only be allotted but be duly quoted in the body of the communication itself. - Neither the reasons nor the statement in the prescribed format is to be found in the order passed u/s 263 of the Act, spelling out the particular category of exception that prevented allotting the DIN on that day. It is yet another violation. - such an order shall be treated to have never been issued and, therefore, shall not take any affect. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.