Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Stay of demand - Scope of the CBDT instructions - As there is no disputation or disagreement that the writ petitioner's case i.e., writ petitioner's plea that interim order is covered by said instruction read with Section 220(6) of IT Act and as the only ground on which the prayer has been negatived is that the writ petitioner is not covered by said instruction, this Court deems it appropriate to interfere qua the impugned order. - Matter restored back - HC
Stay of demand - Scope of the CBDT instructions - As there is no disputation or disagreement that the writ petitioner's case i.e., writ petitioner's plea that interim order is covered by said instruction read with Section 220(6) of IT Act and as the only ground on which the prayer has been negatived is that the writ petitioner is not covered by said instruction, this Court deems it appropriate to interfere qua the impugned order. - Matter restored back - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.