Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
TDS u/s 194I OR 194C - External Development Charges (‘EDC’) paid to Haryana Urban Development Authority (‘HUDA’) - the Revenue does not seek to support the decision of the AO that EDC are ‘rent’ or in the nature of ‘rent’. Thus, concededly, the fundamental reasoning on which the impugned order rests is fundamentally flawed. - Petitioners in these petitions were required to deduct TDS from EDC under Section 194-I - HC
TDS u/s 194I OR 194C - External Development Charges (‘EDC’) paid to Haryana Urban Development Authority (‘HUDA’) - the Revenue does not seek to support the decision of the AO that EDC are ‘rent’ or in the nature of ‘rent’. Thus, concededly, the fundamental reasoning on which the impugned order rests is fundamentally flawed. - Petitioners in these petitions were required to deduct TDS from EDC under Section 194-I - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
