Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Article 227 review permits intervention in arbitration only for manifest, patent inherent jurisdictional defects, not representational authority dispu...
Revision u/s 263 - PCIT observed that AO had failed to examine and verify the issues related to share premium received and interest earned, which issues had remained unaddressed - The action of the Ld. PCIT is in direct contravention of the provisions of Explanation (a)(i) to section 56(2)(vii) of the I.T. Act read with rule 11UA(2)(b) of the I.T. Rules. - AO could not have changed the method of valuation opted by the Assessee - Revision order quashed - AT
Revision u/s 263 - PCIT observed that AO had failed to examine and verify the issues related to share premium received and interest earned, which issues had remained unaddressed - The action of the Ld. PCIT is in direct contravention of the provisions of Explanation (a)(i) to section 56(2)(vii) of the I.T. Act read with rule 11UA(2)(b) of the I.T. Rules. - AO could not have changed the method of valuation opted by the Assessee - Revision order quashed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
