Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - It is thus clear that the claim of the assessee for rental income from commercial complex and tower shown as business income instead of house property was allowed by AO without making necessary enquiry which was called for in the facts and circumstances of the case and there was an error in the order passed by the assessing officer u/s 143(3) - AT
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - It is thus clear that the claim of the assessee for rental income from commercial complex and tower shown as business income instead of house property was allowed by AO without making necessary enquiry which was called for in the facts and circumstances of the case and there was an error in the order passed by the assessing officer u/s 143(3) - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
