Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962 on steamer agent - hat the confiscation of the said vessel for alleged violations of chapter VI of Customs Act, 1962 as well as the duty liability arising from misuse of ‘ship stores’ and ‘bunkers’ had been set aside by the Tribunal. In such circumstances, the related act of wrong-doing has ceased to be and consequently there is no scope for imposition of penalty - No penalty - AT
Penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962 on steamer agent - hat the confiscation of the said vessel for alleged violations of chapter VI of Customs Act, 1962 as well as the duty liability arising from misuse of ‘ship stores’ and ‘bunkers’ had been set aside by the Tribunal. In such circumstances, the related act of wrong-doing has ceased to be and consequently there is no scope for imposition of penalty - No penalty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
