Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Rationalization of the provisions of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 (the PBPT Act) - Any person including initiating officer aggrieved by the order of Adjudicating Authority(AA) may file appeal against AA order within 45 days - Further any Non-Resident person not having any personal or business place in jurisdiction of any high court shall file appeal in the jurisdiction of initiating officer.
Rationalization of the provisions of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 (the PBPT Act) - Any person including initiating officer aggrieved by the order of Adjudicating Authority(AA) may file appeal against AA order within 45 days - Further any Non-Resident person not having any personal or business place in jurisdiction of any high court shall file appeal in the jurisdiction of initiating officer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.