Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme - payment after the cut of date - he petitioners have paid the amount from its bank account on 30.06.2020. The petitioners are not at fault for amount not transferred in the account of the Government by the bank on the same day on 30.06.2020 - for all intent and purpose, it cannot be said that the petitioners have failed to deposit the amount as required under Rule 7 of the Rules. - HC
Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme - payment after the cut of date - he petitioners have paid the amount from its bank account on 30.06.2020. The petitioners are not at fault for amount not transferred in the account of the Government by the bank on the same day on 30.06.2020 - for all intent and purpose, it cannot be said that the petitioners have failed to deposit the amount as required under Rule 7 of the Rules. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.