Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty u/s 271B - no tax audit conducted u/s 44AB - bonafide belief - When Gross profit is more than Rs.4 crores, it means the Gross Receipts were definitely more than Rs.1 crores - Assessee in the case has receipts more than Rs.1 crores. Therefore, the assessee was under obligation to audit the books of account as per section 44AB of the Act - any amount above Rs.1 crores will attract minimum penalty of Rs.1,50,000/- - AT
Penalty u/s 271B - no tax audit conducted u/s 44AB - bonafide belief - When Gross profit is more than Rs.4 crores, it means the Gross Receipts were definitely more than Rs.1 crores - Assessee in the case has receipts more than Rs.1 crores. Therefore, the assessee was under obligation to audit the books of account as per section 44AB of the Act - any amount above Rs.1 crores will attract minimum penalty of Rs.1,50,000/- - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
