Omitted specified domestic transaction provision invalidates related-party expenditure transfer-pricing references and assessments based on consequent...
Preventive suspension requires an immediate continuing threat and cannot become indefinite without inquiry, fresh evidence, or proportionate safeguard...
Insolvency and BankruptcyJanuary 12, 2023Case LawsAT
Initiation of CIRP - It is well settled that in Section 9 proceedings the Adjudicating Authority is not to enter into final adjudication with regard to existence of dispute between the parties regarding operational debt. What has to be looked into is whether the defence raises a dispute which needs further adjudication by a competent court. Disputes pertaining to contractual issues are not to be resolved in Section 9 proceedings. - The Adjudicating Authority has rightly dismissed the application of the Appellant filed u/s 9 of IBC - AT
Initiation of CIRP - It is well settled that in Section 9 proceedings the Adjudicating Authority is not to enter into final adjudication with regard to existence of dispute between the parties regarding operational debt. What has to be looked into is whether the defence raises a dispute which needs further adjudication by a competent court. Disputes pertaining to contractual issues are not to be resolved in Section 9 proceedings. - The Adjudicating Authority has rightly dismissed the application of the Appellant filed u/s 9 of IBC - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
