Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of penalty u/s 271C - Whether appellant is entitled to immunity from penalty as the appellant has opted for VSVS in respect of order u/s 201(1)? - Since the dispute is related to the quantum of 201(1) proceedings the same is already settled and therefore, penalty cannot be imposed subsequently under Section 271C of the Act. - AT
Levy of penalty u/s 271C - Whether appellant is entitled to immunity from penalty as the appellant has opted for VSVS in respect of order u/s 201(1)? - Since the dispute is related to the quantum of 201(1) proceedings the same is already settled and therefore, penalty cannot be imposed subsequently under Section 271C of the Act. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
