Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Prima facie adjustments - while processing the return u/s 143(1) - The tax auditor had not stated in the instant case to disallow Employees Contribution to Provident Fund wherever it is remitted beyond the due date under the respective Act. Hence, the said action of the Ld.CPC Bangalore in disallowing the employees’ contribution to Provident Fund while processing the return u/s 143(1) of the Act is against the provisions of the Act as it would not fall within the ambit of prima facie adjustments. - AT
Prima facie adjustments - while processing the return u/s 143(1) - The tax auditor had not stated in the instant case to disallow Employees Contribution to Provident Fund wherever it is remitted beyond the due date under the respective Act. Hence, the said action of the Ld.CPC Bangalore in disallowing the employees’ contribution to Provident Fund while processing the return u/s 143(1) of the Act is against the provisions of the Act as it would not fall within the ambit of prima facie adjustments. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.