Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Levy of penalty Rule 26 of Central Excise Act, 2002 - charge of abatement in the offence of fraudulent availment of cenvat credit - All the appellant having direct and active role in entire modus operandi of wrong availment of cenvat credit by the manufacturer - Therefore, the penalties imposed on the appellant is correct hence, the same is upheld. - AT
Levy of penalty Rule 26 of Central Excise Act, 2002 - charge of abatement in the offence of fraudulent availment of cenvat credit - All the appellant having direct and active role in entire modus operandi of wrong availment of cenvat credit by the manufacturer - Therefore, the penalties imposed on the appellant is correct hence, the same is upheld. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
