Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of penalty Rule 26 of Central Excise Act, 2002 - charge of abatement in the offence of fraudulent availment of cenvat credit - All the appellant having direct and active role in entire modus operandi of wrong availment of cenvat credit by the manufacturer - Therefore, the penalties imposed on the appellant is correct hence, the same is upheld. - AT
Levy of penalty Rule 26 of Central Excise Act, 2002 - charge of abatement in the offence of fraudulent availment of cenvat credit - All the appellant having direct and active role in entire modus operandi of wrong availment of cenvat credit by the manufacturer - Therefore, the penalties imposed on the appellant is correct hence, the same is upheld. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
