Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Confiscation of imported goods - penalty u/s 112(a) (i) of Customs Act - LED Module Lights Brand Samsung - suspension was made on 22.03.2017 pursuant to examination of the goods. However, the Customs have given intimation to the right holder – Samsung Electronics Co. on 11.04.2017 i.e. after about 20 days and thus, have violated the time line - confiscation and penalty is bad and against the provisions of the law - AT
Confiscation of imported goods - penalty u/s 112(a) (i) of Customs Act - LED Module Lights Brand Samsung - suspension was made on 22.03.2017 pursuant to examination of the goods. However, the Customs have given intimation to the right holder – Samsung Electronics Co. on 11.04.2017 i.e. after about 20 days and thus, have violated the time line - confiscation and penalty is bad and against the provisions of the law - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.