Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate revie...
Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
Insolvency and BankruptcyOctober 15, 2022Case LawsAT
Fraudulent Trading/Wrongful Trading - The stand taken by the respective parties, comes to a Resultant Conclusion that the Transfer of Assets among the Group Companies ex-facie is not a Fraudulent Trading, as per Section 66 (1) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016. - the Plea of Fraudulent Trading as projected by the Appellant / Applicant is not proved, to the subjective satisfaction of this Tribunal, in a convincing manner. - AT
Fraudulent Trading/Wrongful Trading - The stand taken by the respective parties, comes to a Resultant Conclusion that the Transfer of Assets among the Group Companies ex-facie is not a Fraudulent Trading, as per Section 66 (1) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016. - the Plea of Fraudulent Trading as projected by the Appellant / Applicant is not proved, to the subjective satisfaction of this Tribunal, in a convincing manner. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4894 
