Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
100% EOU - Levy of SAD equivalent of VAT - Undisputedly, there was no exemption from VAT in this case. The mere fact that the payment of VAT does not happen concomitantly with the clearance of the goods does not mean that the VAT is exempted. - The appellant is not liable to pay Central Excise duty reckoning the SAD payable on goods cleared by the appellant if they were imported into India - AT
100% EOU - Levy of SAD equivalent of VAT - Undisputedly, there was no exemption from VAT in this case. The mere fact that the payment of VAT does not happen concomitantly with the clearance of the goods does not mean that the VAT is exempted. - The appellant is not liable to pay Central Excise duty reckoning the SAD payable on goods cleared by the appellant if they were imported into India - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
