Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Profiteering - construction of project - benefit of ITC not passed on to the buyers - all the relevant events for the project “Epic” took place in GST regime and the Respondent had not availed any CENVAT/ITC, related to ‘EPIC’ project, in pre-GST regime - there was no pre-GST tax rate or ITC structure which could be compared with the post-GST tax rate and ITC structure and therefore, the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 were not applicable against the Respondent’s project “Epic” - NAPA
Profiteering - construction of project - benefit of ITC not passed on to the buyers - all the relevant events for the project “Epic” took place in GST regime and the Respondent had not availed any CENVAT/ITC, related to ‘EPIC’ project, in pre-GST regime - there was no pre-GST tax rate or ITC structure which could be compared with the post-GST tax rate and ITC structure and therefore, the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 were not applicable against the Respondent’s project “Epic” - NAPA
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
