Revisional jurisdiction over export quota premium deductions requires both error and Revenue prejudice; a permissible assessment view cannot be displa...
Final benami adjudication bars contradictory tax-evasion prosecution where settlement findings confirm full disclosure and cooperation without conceal...
Faceless assessment and registration procedures are updated through electronic communication, revised recovery rules, extended deadlines, and replacem...
Risk-based selective vessel boarding requires accurate declarations and preserves master and agent liability where physical inspections are not select...
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 20, 2022Case LawsAT
Financial Debt or Operational Debt? - mobilization advance given by the Appellant to the Corporate Debtor - Mobilization advance was not disbursed against the consideration for the time value of money. - The guarantee referred to in Section 5(8)(i) must relate to any of the items referred to in sub clauses (a) to (h). The mobilization advance given by the Appellant to the Corporate Debtor does not fall in any of the clauses (a) to (h) hence no benefit can be availed of the Appellant of provisions of Section 5(8)(i). - Not to be treated as Financial Debt - AT
Financial Debt or Operational Debt? - mobilization advance given by the Appellant to the Corporate Debtor - Mobilization advance was not disbursed against the consideration for the time value of money. - The guarantee referred to in Section 5(8)(i) must relate to any of the items referred to in sub clauses (a) to (h). The mobilization advance given by the Appellant to the Corporate Debtor does not fall in any of the clauses (a) to (h) hence no benefit can be availed of the Appellant of provisions of Section 5(8)(i). - Not to be treated as Financial Debt - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
