Coercive recovery during GST searches is restrained pending scrutiny, preserving normal business operations and requiring adherence to investigation g...
COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 20, 2022Case LawsAT
Financial Debt or Operational Debt? - mobilization advance given by the Appellant to the Corporate Debtor - Mobilization advance was not disbursed against the consideration for the time value of money. - The guarantee referred to in Section 5(8)(i) must relate to any of the items referred to in sub clauses (a) to (h). The mobilization advance given by the Appellant to the Corporate Debtor does not fall in any of the clauses (a) to (h) hence no benefit can be availed of the Appellant of provisions of Section 5(8)(i). - Not to be treated as Financial Debt - AT
Financial Debt or Operational Debt? - mobilization advance given by the Appellant to the Corporate Debtor - Mobilization advance was not disbursed against the consideration for the time value of money. - The guarantee referred to in Section 5(8)(i) must relate to any of the items referred to in sub clauses (a) to (h). The mobilization advance given by the Appellant to the Corporate Debtor does not fall in any of the clauses (a) to (h) hence no benefit can be availed of the Appellant of provisions of Section 5(8)(i). - Not to be treated as Financial Debt - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
