Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Levy of penalty under Section 10-A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - existence of mens rea - plea of bonafide belief had been raised - it was incumbent on the assessing authority to consider the same and pass appropriate order especially with respect to allegation of false declaration. Unless that finding had been returned by the assessing authority, it is difficult to sustain the penalty under Section 10-A of the Act.- HC
Levy of penalty under Section 10-A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - existence of mens rea - plea of bonafide belief had been raised - it was incumbent on the assessing authority to consider the same and pass appropriate order especially with respect to allegation of false declaration. Unless that finding had been returned by the assessing authority, it is difficult to sustain the penalty under Section 10-A of the Act.- HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
