Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
Disciplinary proportionality requires penalties for Authorised Representative misconduct to match proven harm, leading to reconsideration of registrat...
Appellant are Financial Creditors or not - no direct disbursal of amount to the Corporate Debtor/Guarantor - Related Parties of the Corporate Debtor or not - The Appellants do have Positive Powers and are in a position to directly and indirectly Control the management and the policy decisions of the Corporate Debtor and hence there are no illegality in the Impugned Order passed by the Adjudicating Authority affirming the decision of the RP in deleting the Appellants from being part of the CoC as stipulated for under Section 21(2) of the Code. - AT
Appellant are Financial Creditors or not - no direct disbursal of amount to the Corporate Debtor/Guarantor - Related Parties of the Corporate Debtor or not - The Appellants do have Positive Powers and are in a position to directly and indirectly Control the management and the policy decisions of the Corporate Debtor and hence there are no illegality in the Impugned Order passed by the Adjudicating Authority affirming the decision of the RP in deleting the Appellants from being part of the CoC as stipulated for under Section 21(2) of the Code. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
