Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Refund claim of excess duty paid - price revision with retrospective effect - rejection on the ground of unjust enrichment - It is found that adequate entries have been made by the appellant in the Books of Accounts and they have credited the account of Hero Motor Corp. Further, the amount of refund claim have been shown as duty recoverable from the revenue in the Books of Accounts and the financial statements of the appellant being balance-sheet. - Refund allowed - AT
Refund claim of excess duty paid - price revision with retrospective effect - rejection on the ground of unjust enrichment - It is found that adequate entries have been made by the appellant in the Books of Accounts and they have credited the account of Hero Motor Corp. Further, the amount of refund claim have been shown as duty recoverable from the revenue in the Books of Accounts and the financial statements of the appellant being balance-sheet. - Refund allowed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.